Don't let ZhiYanZhai to pit
Q: a lot of GongXueGu valued very much ZhiYanZhai commentaries, even with it demonstrates many problems, but your book seems evaluation is not very high?
Wang: it depends on the perspective from which, if to textual research, experiences, cao xueqin historical writing process, then ZhiYanZhai is the most valuable information. Because the information itself less, find no fault cao xueqin birth certificate, check out his household evolution, check out his school archives, no personnel registration, nothing, result have a ZhiYanZhai knows everything, like writing process through his examination, is apt to order the delete how many words. So this is extremely valuable information. But if we (based on ZhiYanZhai) understand this book of words, I feel let ZhiYanZhai to pit.
Because the literary creation impossible from beginning to end all is factual records, book has said a "false do a really also fake". Writer to fictional a thing, you need to have a large amount of real materials, fictional after letting a person listen with same really to just go. I'm not saying to ZhiYanZhai my comments have what opinion, but that we can examine the dream, feelings of a dream of red mansions, accept a dream of red mansions ", everything with ZhiYanZhai for is affirmation don't understand "hong Lou meng".
No comments:
Post a Comment